The Supreme Court on Monday heard matters relating to student protests over the alleged NEET paper leak and clarified the scope of the term “criminal antecedents” used in its earlier order. A bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi, and Justice V. Mohan stated that the expression refers only to serious and heinous offences such as murder and rape.
The bench observed that all states, including Delhi, are free to withdraw or close criminal cases against student protesters in accordance with the law. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta informed the court that the Central Government remains committed to not pursuing cases registered against students involved in the protests.
During the hearing, concerns were raised regarding the alleged use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies, deployment of personnel in plain clothes, and the use of pellet guns. The Chief Justice remarked that officials responsible for excessive force should not receive unwarranted protection and indicated that the court may consider framing guidelines governing the use of pellet guns. The matter has been listed for further hearing on August 18.
In a separate hearing related to the 2026 NEET-UG paper leak investigation, the Central Government told the Supreme Court that it would file a detailed affidavit outlining the examination security process. The affidavit will cover every stage of the examination cycle, including printing of question papers, transportation, distribution at examination centres, and security arrangements.
Appearing before a bench led by Justice P.S. Narasimha, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said the government intends to place the entire procedure on record. The court responded that it also wishes to examine the complete process. The matter will be heard again on Thursday. The 2026 NEET-UG paper leak case is currently under investigation by the CBI.
Meanwhile, a retired Air Force officer has moved the Supreme Court seeking action against the organizers of the July 20 “Parliament March,” alleging that certain statements made during the event incited violence. The petition is expected to come up for hearing later this week.
Posted inTOP STORIES
